In February 2023, Meyer Wilson Werning attorneys won a case that most firms would have walked away from. Their client, a Guam attorney, had handed his life savings to Asia Pacific Financial Management Group, a Guam-based investment firm. By the time he discovered what had happened, that account held less than $30,000. MWW took the case, built the record, and prevailed.
An arbitration panel awarded him roughly $4.2 million, including punitive damages that matched his compensatory losses dollar for dollar. Eight weeks later the firm filed for bankruptcy, told regulators the filing was driven by its broker-dealer liability, and kept its investment advisory business running as if nothing had happened.
That case, now fully concluded, is a documented blueprint for how financial firms can lose in arbitration, shed accountability on one registration, and keep doing business on the other. If you have suffered significant investment losses, contact us today for a free and confidential consultation.
What Asia Pacific Financial Did to a Guam Attorney’s Life Savings
Asia Pacific Financial Management Group, Inc. operated out of Hagatna, Guam, holding both a FINRA-regulated broker-dealer registration and an SEC-registered investment adviser registration simultaneously. As MWW’s trial team demonstrated, that dual structure created the conditions for years of unchecked misconduct.
The client was charged quarterly advisory fees for investment management by broker Khay Sung, who had never taken the Series 65 exam and held no investment adviser license. Roughly eight months after the account opened, the firm rewrote the client’s investor profile without his knowledge, changing his objectives to speculative, adding experience he did not have, and enabling margin. In the first month, over $1 million in margin was drawn against the account.
Margin calls were then covered by liquidating securities without notifying the client. He was moved to paperless statements in 2016 and had no online account login through 2020. During that period, more than 700 compliance alerts were generated on his account. Not one resulted in supervisory contact. MWW’s investigation uncovered the full extent of that damage when the firm took the case in 2021. Net losses totaled $1,520,768, including approximately $314,527 in advisory fees and more than $1 million in margin interest.
We Have Recovered Over
$350 Million for Our Clients Nationwide.
How Meyer Wilson Werning Built and Won the Case
MWW attorneys David P. Meyer and Courtney M. Werning filed the statement of claim on October 28, 2021. After a ten-session hearing in February 2023, a fully public, three-arbitrator panel found Asia Pacific liable on every major theory, including negligence, unsuitability, failure to supervise, unauthorized trading, breach of fiduciary duty, and violations of the Guam Uniform Securities Act.
On February 28, 2023, the panel awarded $1,520,768.65 in compensatory damages and an equal $1,520,768.65 in punitive damages under Guam law. With interest at 6% per annum running back to July 9, 2009, the total reached approximately $4.2 million. FINRA records the base award as $3,042,162.30 (FINRA Case No. 21-02729). The punitive award, dollar for dollar equal to compensatory damages, reflected a record MWW built piece by piece across years of account statements, compliance logs, and licensing documentation.
What Happened After and Why It Matters
Eight weeks after the award, on April 26, 2023, Asia Pacific filed for Chapter 11 protection in the District of Guam (Case No. 23-00005). In its own FINRA disclosure, the firm attributed the filing directly to the MWW arbitration award and confirmed its advisory business was continuing. The broker-dealer registration terminated on February 20, 2024.
The bankruptcy was discharged June 20, 2024. MWW pursued recovery through the bankruptcy proceeding and the investor recovered a significant portion of the award. That outcome required MWW to continue fighting well beyond the hearing room. The broker-dealer is gone. The advisory business kept going. MWW’s win put that sequence on the public record for the first time.
Our lawyers are nationwide leaders in investment fraud cases.
The Dual-Registration Loophole That the Asia Pacific Case Exposes
The Asia Pacific case that MWW tried in 2023 is the clearest documented example of how this loophole works in practice. Meyer is a past president of the Public Investors Advocate Bar Association (PIABA) and a co-author of PIABA’s national report on unpaid arbitration awards. Werning currently serves as Vice President of PIABA. Both have published data on this structural problem for years.
When a firm holds both a FINRA broker-dealer registration and an SEC investment adviser registration, those registrations are legally distinct. A liability that attaches to one side does not automatically follow to the other. A firm can file for bankruptcy on the broker-dealer side, discharge the award, and continue advising clients under its separate registration. No rule currently closes that gap automatically.
According to PIABA’s research, roughly 37 percent of FINRA arbitration awards to customers went unpaid in 2024, amounting to approximately 37 cents of every dollar awarded. Between 2020 and 2024, an estimated $80 million in investor awards went uncollected. In March 2026, FINRA approved a $100 million fee rebate to its member firms, on top of a $50 million rebate the prior year, while those awards remained unsatisfied.
We Are The firm other lawyers
call for support.
What MWW’s Case File Reveals That Every Investor Should Know
MWW’s record in the Asia Pacific case surfaced each of these failures in documented detail. They are warning signs any investor can check for today.
- Verify your adviser’s license. Khay Sung collected advisory fees for years without an investment adviser license. A broker charging advisory fees must hold a Series 65 or equivalent. Verify through your state regulator or FINRA BrokerCheck before placing any assets.
- Understand your firm’s registration structure. Knowing which registration governs your account, and what protections apply to each, matters when something goes wrong.
- Review your investor profile on file. MWW’s investigation found Asia Pacific rewrote the client’s profile to enable trading he never approved. If your profile does not accurately reflect your risk tolerance or experience, correct it in writing.
- Know that winning an arbitration award is the beginning of collection, not the end. MWW had to pursue recovery through bankruptcy after the award was issued. Having attorneys who know how to pursue both registrations matters.
How Meyer Wilson Werning Can Help
Meyer Wilson Werning has recovered over $350 million for more than 1,000 clients nationwide since 1999. The firm operates on a pure contingency fee basis, meaning clients pay nothing unless MWW recovers on their behalf.
In the Asia Pacific case, MWW took on a dually registered firm whose broker operated without a license for years, a firm that dismissed over 700 compliance alerts, and hid margin activity from a client who trusted them with his entire net worth. MWW built the record, secured punitive damages, and then pursued recovery through bankruptcy when the firm attempted to escape the award.
As PIABA leaders, Meyer and Werning have been publishing the national data on the unpaid award problem for years. When they took the Asia Pacific case, they were not just fighting for one client. They were creating a documented record of exactly how this structural loophole operates.
If your investment losses involve unsuitable recommendations, unauthorized trading, a failure of supervision, or a firm structuring itself to avoid accountability, the time to act is now. Contact us today for a free and confidential consultation.
Frequently Asked Questions
What Did Meyer Wilson Werning Win Against Asia Pacific Financial?
MWW attorneys David P. Meyer and Courtney M. Werning secured a FINRA arbitration award of $3,042,162.30 in base damages, comprised of $1,520,768.65 in compensatory damages and an equal amount in punitive damages under Guam law. With interest running back to July 9, 2009, the total reached approximately $4.2 million. The award was issued February 28, 2023 by a fully public, three-arbitrator panel.
What Is the Dual-Registration Loophole That Allows Firms to Escape Arbitration Awards?
A firm holding both a FINRA broker-dealer registration and an SEC investment adviser registration can file for bankruptcy on the broker-dealer side, discharge an arbitration award, shut down that registration, and continue operating as an investment adviser. MWW documented this sequence in the Asia Pacific case. No rule currently closes that gap automatically.
How Do I Check Whether My Broker or Firm Has a History of Complaints?
FINRA’s BrokerCheck allows any investor to search by firm name, CRD number, or individual broker name. Asia Pacific Financial Management Group’s report at CRD 32338 carries the full MWW award and the bankruptcy disclosure in a single public document.
Recovering Losses Caused by Investment Misconduct.