Osaic has now paid $17.2 million to settle investor claims connected to former broker Jim Walesa, whose recommendations of illiquid alternative investments allegedly caused significant financial harm. The largest settlement, finalized in July 2025, totaled $9.75 million, nearly double the original $5 million demand.
If you or someone you know has suffered significant investment losses working with Jim Walesa, Osaic, or another brokerage firm or broker, don’t hesitate to reach out to Meyer Wilson Werning today. Our attorneys are experienced in securities fraud cases and will help to guide you through the process with a free consultation to determine whether your losses are the result of actionable misconduct.
How Jim Walesa’s Conduct Impacted Investors
Jim Walesa (CRD#: 1061209) spent nearly four decades in the securities industry, including 19 years with Triad Advisors (later acquired by Osaic) and two years with Arkadios Capital before leaving the industry in 2021. Afterward, he became CEO of senior care technology company Clearday.
Illiquid and Alternative Investments
The core of the investor complaints centers on the type of products Walesa recommended. These investments were often marketed as opportunities for diversification and higher yields, but in reality, they carried risks many investors were not prepared for:
- Illiquidity concerns – Investors could not easily sell or access their money once committed.
- Conflicts of interest – Some products were linked to businesses Walesa allegedly owned or managed.
- Underperformance – The investments failed to deliver the returns suggested to clients.
For many investors, these characteristics combined into a worst-case scenario—funds locked up in underperforming ventures that also raised questions about whose interests were being served.
Legal Settlements and Regulatory Action
The fallout from these practices has been significant, not only for investors but also for Osaic as the successor to Triad Advisors. Regulators and courts have addressed these issues in multiple ways, creating a picture of escalating accountability:
- $9.75M July 2025 settlement – The single largest resolution so far, tied to real estate securities.
- Total $17.2M in settlements – Reflecting Osaic’s financial responsibility for Walesa’s misconduct.
- FINRA lawsuit (2025) – Regulatory action aiming to bar Walesa from the securities industry.
- $34M pending lawsuit – A major claim still awaiting resolution.
Together, these outcomes show how unsuitable recommendations can ripple outward: investors lose money, firms pay settlements, and regulators pursue industry bars.
We Have Recovered Over
$350 Million for Our Clients Nationwide.
Investor Rights and Legal Options
When misconduct occurs, investors are not powerless. The law provides multiple avenues for recovery, and knowing the types of claims that may apply can help victims frame their cases more effectively.
Common Claims in Cases Like This
- Negligence – Recommending products inappropriate for a client’s needs or risk tolerance.
- Breach of Fiduciary Duty – Prioritizing personal or firm interests over those of investors.
- Misrepresentation – Providing misleading assurances or withholding critical details.
- Consumer Protection Violations – Engaging in deceptive or unfair sales practices.
Each of these claims can be applied depending on the facts of a case, and often multiple theories are used in arbitration or court to give investors the best chance at recovery.
Steps Investors Should Take
Investors considering action should be proactive in preserving their rights. Immediate steps can help establish the evidence needed to prove a case:
- Gather documentation – Account statements, contracts, and advisor communications.
- Record verbal assurances – Notes about promises of “safety” or “guaranteed” returns.
- Act quickly – Filing deadlines can bar claims if too much time passes.
Following these steps gives attorneys a clearer foundation to demonstrate how unsuitable recommendations occurred and how investors were misled.
How Meyer Wilson Werning Helps Investors
Cases like those involving Jim Walesa demonstrate how damaging unsuitable advice can be—especially when tied to conflicts of interest. At Meyer Wilson Werning, we focus exclusively on representing investors, never brokerage firms. Our team investigates how products were sold, whether firms met their supervisory duties, and how investors were misled. With millions already recovered for clients, we stand ready to pursue arbitration or other legal action to help victims of investment fraud. Contact us today for a free consultation to discuss your case and learn how we can assist you in protecting your financial interests.
Our lawyers are nationwide leaders in investment fraud cases.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is former broker Jim Walesa and why are investors filing claims against him?
Jim Walesa is a former financial advisor accused of recommending high-risk, illiquid alternative investments that were unsuitable for many clients. These products often failed to perform and raised concerns about conflicts of interest.
How much money has Osaic paid in investor settlements connected to Jim Walesa?
Osaic has paid $17.2 million in settlements so far, including a record $9.75 million resolution in July 2025. A larger $34 million lawsuit is still pending against the firm.
What types of alternative investments did Jim Walesa recommend to clients?
Walesa allegedly pushed illiquid alternative products, some of which were tied to businesses he owned or controlled. Investors claimed that these investments locked up investor funds and delivered poor returns.
Has FINRA or any regulator taken action against Jim Walesa for broker misconduct?
Yes, in 2025 FINRA initiated a lawsuit seeking to bar Walesa from the securities industry. This lawsuit is still pending.
What steps should investors take if they suffered losses through Jim Walesa?
Investors should gather account records, contracts, and any advisor communications right away. Acting quickly is important because strict filing deadlines may limit recovery options. An experienced securities fraud attorney can help with each step of the process.
Recovering Losses Caused by Investment Misconduct.