David Lerner Associates has been under regulatory scrutiny for its handling of energy investments—especially regarding unsuitable recommendations and improper supervision. These concerns are more than procedural; they have real financial consequences for investors.
If you or someone you know has suffered significant investment losses working with David Lerner Associates or another brokerage firm, don’t hesitate to reach out to Meyer Wilson Werning today. Our attorneys are experienced in securities fraud cases and will help to guide you through the process with a free consultation to determine whether your losses are the result of actionable misconduct.
Energy Investments and the Risks Behind the Promises
Investments in the energy sector—particularly oil, gas, and renewables—can offer high returns, but they often carry elevated risks. A notable example involves the 2024 settlement between David Lerner Associates (CRD#: 5397) and regulators. The firm agreed to pay over $1 million in restitution to more than 200 investors after allegations that it recommended unsuitable energy investments, especially to elderly clients.
From 2015 to 2019, the firm raised roughly $593 million from over 6,000 customers for two partnerships: Energy 11 LP and Energy Resources 12 LP. These were marketed as income-generating opportunities—but for many investors, they resulted in substantial losses.
Here’s what made these investments so risky:
- Volatility in oil and gas prices, which can erode value quickly.
- Illiquidity, meaning investors couldn’t easily sell or access their funds.
- Complex and opaque fee structures, often with high commissions.
- Unsuitable allocations, especially for retirees seeking stability.
When the price of Energy 11 plummeted by over 50% during the pandemic, the consequences were severe—particularly for more than 120 investors aged 76 or older, whom regulators found had their risk tolerances improperly adjusted to justify the sales.
We Have Recovered Over
$350 Million for Our Clients Nationwide.
What Drives Risk in Energy Investments?
The performance of energy-related securities can fluctuate due to a number of unpredictable factors. Understanding these drivers is essential to evaluating whether the investment is appropriate—something financial advisors are legally obligated to assess before making recommendations.
Some of the major influences on energy investment outcomes include:
- Commodity price swings, especially in crude oil and natural gas.
- Regulatory and environmental policy shifts, which can alter the investment landscape overnight.
- Economic trends, such as changes in energy consumption or inflation.
- Geopolitical instability, which may disrupt production or supply chains.
Given these variables, financial advisors must ensure that energy investments are aligned with the investor’s profile—not just potentially profitable.
Regulatory Failures and the Cost to Investors
The enforcement actions against David Lerner Associates reveal deeper issues within how some firms supervise and recommend complex financial products. According to the settlement, the firm not only failed to maintain adequate supervisory systems but also allowed sales of unsuitable energy products to vulnerable investors.
Investors affected by these actions often face losses due to:
- Misrepresentation of investment risks or expected performance.
- Altered investor profiles, such as inflating a customer’s risk tolerance.
- High upfront commissions, with David Lerner reportedly earning up to 6% on these deals.
- Inaccessibility of funds, leaving investors trapped in declining investments.
This type of conduct can give rise to legal claims for damages, especially when the financial advisor’s actions are found to violate industry suitability standards.
Our lawyers are nationwide leaders in investment fraud cases.
How Fee Structures Erode Investment Value
The true cost of energy investments often extends beyond market performance. Many of these offerings, such as limited partnerships, include fees that reduce returns before a single dollar is invested.
Common cost elements include:
- Sales commissions paid to the brokerage firm.
- Ongoing management or operational fees that chip away at annual returns.
- Exit fees or penalties, making early liquidation difficult or costly.
These fees were a significant concern in the David Lerner Associates case and serve as a reminder that even “attractive” investments can carry financial burdens that disproportionately benefit the firm over the investor.
We Are The firm other lawyers
call for support.
Legal Remedies Available to Harmed Investors
If you suffered losses due to unsuitable energy investments recommended by David Lerner Associates or a similar firm, contact our team at Meyer Wilson Werning today. With over 20 years of experience and $350 million in recovered losses for our clients, we are well-versed in handling cases such as these.
Frequently Asked Questions
How can I evaluate the suitability of energy investments?
Evaluating suitability involves researching the investment’s structure, understanding fee implications, and assessing alignment with your financial goals and risk tolerance.
What legal options do I have if I received unsuitable investment recommendations?
Investors may pursue claims through FINRA arbitration or seek legal representation to recover losses from unsuitable investment recommendations.
How do fee structures impact energy investment returns?
Complicated fee structures can erode investor returns by taking a significant portion of capital before actual investments are made, impacting overall profitability.
What role does FINRA play in regulating energy investments?
FINRA oversees the securities industry, ensuring compliance with regulations to protect investors from unsuitable investments and unethical practices.
Recovering Losses Caused by Investment Misconduct.
