The cumulative preferred stock structure is often marketed as a stable investment option thanks to its guaranteed dividend priority, but real-world performance shows that these products can expose investors to significant risks—especially when the issuing company faces financial pressure. Cumulative preferred shares require companies to repay all missed dividends before distributing anything to common shareholders, giving investors the appearance of added security. Yet when dividends are suspended, arrears can build for years, causing investors to rely heavily on the issuing company’s health and decision-making.
If you experienced losses due to unsuitable recommendations involving cumulative preferred stock, you’re not alone—the securities fraud lawyers at Meyer Wilson Werning can help. Reach out today to discuss your next steps with us.
How Cumulative Preferred Stock Works and Why It’s Structured This Way
Cumulative preferred shares sit between debt and common equity. They offer fixed dividends—usually based on the par value of the stock—and obligate the company to repay all missed dividends before paying any other equity class. This design helps companies raise capital at a lower cost, since the cumulative feature reduces dividend risk for investors.
Key Features of Cumulative Preferred Stock
Cumulative preferred shares typically include:
- Mandatory repayment of missed dividends, known as dividends in arrears
- Priority claims ahead of common shareholders for both dividends and liquidation payouts
- Fixed dividend rates, often paid quarterly
- Lower dividend yields than non-cumulative preferred stock due to the added protection
The structure is intended to mimic some benefits of bonds, but without the full protection bondholders receive in bankruptcy situations.
How Dividend Arrears Accumulate
When a company experiences financial trouble, it may suspend dividends to preserve cash for debt payments and operational expenses. For cumulative preferred shareholders, this means missed dividends begin to stack until the company recovers. Consider this simplified example based on typical market structures:
- A company issues cumulative preferred shares with a par value of $20,000 and a 6% annual rate, creating a $1,200 annual dividend obligation
- If the company pays only half of that in year one, shareholders accumulate $600 owed per share
- If no dividend is paid in year two, arrears grow to $1,800
- When dividends resume in year three, the company must pay the $1,800 in arrears plus the current year’s $1,200, totaling $3,000 per share, before paying other shareholders
Situations like this demonstrate why investors must pay close attention to the financial strength of the issuing company.
We Have Recovered Over
$350 Million for Our Clients Nationwide.
Why Dividend Priority Doesn’t Eliminate Risk
Although cumulative preferred stock provides repayment rights, those rights only matter if the issuing company recovers. Investors may see arrears accumulate for years without any guarantee of repayment, especially if the company undergoes restructuring or enters a prolonged downturn. Many investors only realize the downside after multiple years of suspended dividends with no clear path to recovery.
Risk Factors That Investors Often Overlook
Financial advisors sometimes present cumulative preferred stock as conservative or income-focused, but risks include:
- Extended dividend suspensions that delay income—sometimes indefinitely
- Market value volatility tied to interest-rate changes and the issuing company’s creditworthiness
- Lower yields compared to non-cumulative preferred shares, reducing income potential
- Reduced liquidity, making it difficult to exit during periods of instability
- Subordination to debt holders, meaning cumulative preferred investors still stand behind all corporate debt in a liquidation scenario
These risks become more pronounced when companies face repeated earnings shortfalls or take on heavy debt burdens to maintain operations.
Company Health and Oversight Issues
Investors must recognize that dividend protections only work when companies eventually regain the ability to pay. Companies may issue cumulative preferred stock because it lowers their cost of capital, but that benefit may come at investors’ expense if the business encounters distress. A prolonged suspension of dividends can leave cumulative preferred holders in limbo—unable to exit without losses and without a clear timeline for arrears repayment.
Why Cumulative Preferred Stock Can Be Riskier Than It Appears
Cumulative preferred shares may look attractive due to the promise of future repayment, but they rely entirely on the issuing company’s stability and the financial advisor’s explanation of the risks. Many investors are not told that cumulative preferred shares can become effectively non-paying assets for years, even though the company technically owes arrears. And because preferred stock ranks below debt, investors may recover little—or nothing—if the company fails.
Situations That Create High-Risk Conditions
These investments are especially risky when:
- The company has high debt obligations that take priority over dividends
- The business operates in a cyclical industry with volatile revenue
- Dividends are suspended multiple times over several years
- Investors were encouraged to rely on these shares for steady income
Without clear guidance, investors may assume the cumulative feature guarantees repayment—even though repayment is only possible if the company becomes profitable enough to catch up.
Our lawyers are nationwide leaders in investment fraud cases.
How Meyer Wilson Werning Helps Investors Harmed by Preferred Stock Recommendations
The risks tied to cumulative preferred stock can be severe when financial advisors misrepresent the product’s safety or recommend it to investors who need dependable income. Meyer Wilson Werning represents investors who suffered losses because their financial advisors failed to disclose the true risks, ignored warning signs about the issuing company’s financial health, or recommended unsuitable preferred-stock products.
Our team investigates how the investment was sold, evaluates whether supervisory failures occurred, and pursues recovery through arbitration or litigation. If you experienced losses tied to cumulative preferred stock, contact Meyer Wilson Werning today to learn how we can help you move forward.
We Are The firm other lawyers
call for support.
Frequently Asked Questions
What risks do investors face when dividends are suspended on cumulative preferred stock?
When dividends stop, unpaid amounts begin to accumulate—sometimes for years—leaving investors without income and no guarantee the company will ever catch up. If the business never recovers, those arrears may remain unpaid indefinitely.
How does cumulative preferred stock really work compared to traditional income investments?
Cumulative preferred shares promise fixed dividends and repayment of missed payments, but only if the issuing company becomes healthy enough to resume distributions. Unlike bonds, preferred shareholders still sit behind all corporate debt in a bankruptcy or restructuring.
Why can cumulative preferred stock be unsuitable for conservative or income-focused investors?
These shares can become non-paying for long periods during financial stress, causing income gaps many retirees cannot absorb. Their market value can also fall sharply when credit conditions worsen or interest rates rise.
What makes cumulative preferred stock appear safer than it actually is?
The term “cumulative” suggests guaranteed repayment, but repayment depends entirely on the company’s future profitability. Many investors are surprised to learn arrears offer no protection if the issuer fails or restructures.
Can investors recover losses if a financial advisor misrepresented cumulative preferred stock?
Yes—investors may pursue claims if an advisor oversold the product’s safety, ignored red flags about the company’s financial stability, or recommended it despite known income needs. Recovery often occurs through arbitration against the brokerage firm responsible for the recommendation.
Recovering Losses Caused by Investment Misconduct.