
Echo Therapeutics (NASDAQ: ECTE) presents notable risks for investors, particularly those who may have relied on their financial advisor’s guidance. As a medical device company with a troubled history—marked by operating losses, product development challenges, and dependence on third-party collaborations—Echo’s trajectory raises serious concerns.
The company’s financial instability, including its eventual delisting from the NASDAQ, suggests that investors may not have received appropriate guidance about the risks involved.
If you have suffered significant losses in a risky investment underwritten by Aegis Capital Corp. such as Echo Therapeutics, reach out to Meyer Wilson Werning today. Our attorneys have experience recovering losses for our clients who unknowingly invested in products that were unsuitable for their portfolio.


Echo Therapeutics’ Financial Instability and Offering History
Major Stock Offering and Subsequent Collapse
On June 13, 2013, Echo Therapeutics announced a public offering of 4,025,000 shares at $2.70 each. Despite the capital raised, the offering did not resolve the company’s underlying financial problems. By 2016, Echo was delisted from NASDAQ after failing to maintain the required minimum share price of $1, undermining its credibility with institutional and retail investors alike.
Persistent Operating Losses
Echo reported a net loss of nearly $7 million in Q1 2013 alone. This loss continued a pattern of chronic deficits, which is particularly concerning in an industry where substantial R&D and operational funding are required. Without consistent revenue or successful product commercialization, the company lacked the financial foundation necessary to deliver long-term shareholder value.
We Have Recovered Over
$350 Million for Our Clients Nationwide.
Key Investment Risks with Echo Therapeutics
Insufficient Capital Resources
Echo has frequently emphasized its need for external funding to support its product pipeline. Without it, the company may:
-
Delay or halt product development and commercialization.
-
Fail to meet strategic business milestones.
-
Struggle to remain a going concern.
Exposure to Economic Downturns
In times of global or national economic stress, potential customers’ purchasing power declines, affecting:
-
Demand for Echo’s medical products.
-
Revenue and earnings growth.
-
The viability of Echo’s go-to-market strategies.
Reliance on Third-Party Partnerships
Echo depends on third parties to support clinical trials and product development. This reliance introduces vulnerabilities, such as:
-
Delays due to unavailability of clinical trial subjects.
-
Disruption in partnerships that can derail time-sensitive product launches.
-
Limited control over crucial stages of research and development.
Aegis Capital Corp’s Role in Underwriting
Underwriting Connection and Potential Conflicts
Aegis Capital Corp served as the underwriter for Echo Therapeutics’ 2013 stock offering. While underwriting itself is not inherently problematic, it introduces potential conflicts of interest, especially if affiliated brokers encouraged clients to invest in Echo stock while the firm stood to gain from the offering.
Concerns About Investor Recommendations
Because underwriters like Aegis are financially incentivized to promote the success of offerings they back, they may:
-
Recommend investments without fully disclosing associated risks.
-
Prioritize firm profits over investor interests.
-
Expose clients to high-risk, speculative ventures like Echo Therapeutics.
Investors who were steered toward Echo shares through brokers connected to Aegis may have been put in harm’s way without appropriate justification.
Our lawyers are nationwide leaders in investment fraud cases.
How Meyer Wilson Werning Helps Investors Affected by Echo Therapeutics
If your financial advisor recommended Echo Therapeutics without fully disclosing its financial instability, dependency on third-party development, or the underwriter’s potential conflicts of interest, you may have grounds for recovery.
At Meyer Wilson Werning, we help investors who suffer losses due to questionable investment advice or potential misconduct by their financial professionals. Our attorneys help investors manage the intricate landscape of securities law, pursuing claims against brokers or firms that violated their fiduciary duties or regulatory obligations. Contact us today for a free consultation.
We Are The firm other lawyers
call for support.
Frequently Asked Questions


Why is Echo Therapeutics considered a risky investment?
Echo faced chronic operating losses, failed to successfully commercialize its products, and was delisted from NASDAQ. These red flags suggest that the company lacked the financial stability needed to support long-term investor confidence.
What role did Aegis Capital Corp play in the Echo Therapeutics stock offering?
Aegis Capital Corp underwrote Echo’s 2013 public offering. This role can create potential conflicts of interest if brokers affiliated with Aegis encouraged investments in Echo while benefiting financially from the offering.
Can a financial advisor be held accountable for recommending Echo stock?
Yes. If a financial advisor recommended Echo without adequately disclosing the risks—such as financial instability or underwriter conflicts—they may be liable for unsuitable investment advice.
Recovering Losses Caused by Investment Misconduct.