Call Now For a Free Consultation:
(614) 502-6165

REITs Losses Attract Attention From FINRA

Non-traded REITs Land in FINRA’s Cross Hairs

Today’s economic climate, while improving over that of recent years, continues to yield returns that are lower than what many investors need or want. Unfortunately, this has caused a significant number of investors to consider alternative investments – like risky non-traded real estate investment trusts (REITs) – that they likely would never consider otherwise.

Even more unfortunate, however, is the eagerness of broker-dealer firms to satisfy investors’ demands for higher yields by selling complicated products without first discussing or even understanding the products’ inherent risks.

This has, as we’ve seen from a variety of non-traded REIT complaints and securities arbitration cases like those involving the Apple Non-traded REITssold by David Lerner Associates, led to a significant loss of principal for many investors – losses that are attracting the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority’s attention.

In a speech given late last month, Susan Axelrod, executive vice president of member regulation sales practices at FINRA, discussed the dangers of non-traded REITs and acknowledged that the organization “has a number of open investigations” related to the sale of the products.

“In several instances, FINRA examiners have found that firms selling these products failed to conduct reasonable diligence before selling a product and failed to make a determination that the product was suitable for investors,” said Axelrod in the speech. “FINRA examiners [also] have noted that—in the instances of REITs that have experienced financial difficulties—red flags existed and should have been considered by firms prior to the product being offered to firm clients.”

According to Axelrod, to avoid enforcement actions and litigation, broker-dealers who sell non-traded REITs must make sure they conduct their due diligence, train their brokers to understand the products, and ensure they are suitable for their clients for recommending them.

Firms and brokers also should make sure they fully understand – and advise their clients of – three of the products’ biggest limitations:

Lack of liquidity.

“There is a very limited or no secondary market for shares. Thus, investors in these products have very few alternatives should they decide they need to liquidate their positions,” she said. In short, “Non-traded REITs are rarely suitable for investors with short time horizons.”

Problems with valuation.

“REIT offerings normally last several years, and during the offering period, broker-dealers selling them reflect an estimated per-share price on customer statements—typically the public offering price. This is sometimes the case for years after the customer's initial purchase. Unfortunately, we have recently seen several high-profile instances of REITs re-pricing their per-share estimated values at substantially less than the offering price—with little or no advance notice to investors.”

Unclear distributions.

“Non-traded REITs may also borrow funds to make distributions if operating cash flow is insufficient. And excessive borrowing may increase the risk of default or devaluation. In addition, non-traded REIT distributions may actually be a return of principal. For these reasons, brokers must use caution when discussing distributions with investors, particularly when making comparisons to other dividend-paying investments.”

Based on Ms. Axelrod’s remarks, it seems likely that we’ll see a number of new enforcement actions filed in the coming months against broker-dealers for actions related to the sale and recommendation of non-traded REITs. These claims will likely involve misrepresentations, lack of due diligence, and unsuitable recommendations. Investor claims based on such misconduct likely will rise as well.

If you believe you have suffered losses in a non-traded REIT due to a broker’s misconduct, contact us to discuss your case or complete the online form on the top of this page and we will respond promptly.

The information contained in The Firm’s posts on its blog, fraud alerts, investigations or elsewhere on the site is based upon information obtained from other sources including, but not limited to, news outlets and federal, state, and regulatory agency filings. All suspects and subjects of postings herein are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law or administrative action and any and all crimes are alleged until a court or regulatory agency finds otherwise .

Share This Story
If you found the information provided by this article useful, consider sharing to your social media channels to help others in their search for reliable resources.
Consult with Our Legal Team
There is never a cost associated with a consultation
Columbus Office

614-224-6000
305 W. Nationwide Blvd
Columbus, OH 43215
Meyer Wilson
New Orleans Office

900 Camp Street 
Suite 337
New Orleans, LA 70130
Los Angeles Office

310-905-8688
2029 Century Park East,
Suite 400N
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Cleveland Office

216-600-1355
4781 Richmond Rd.
Suite 400
Warrensville Heights, OH 44128
Bloomfield Hills Office

248-817-8214
41000 Woodward Ave.,
Suite 350
Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304
Quick Links
The information contained in this Website is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter. No recipients of content from this site, clients or otherwise, should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included in the site without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from an attorney licensed in the recipient's state. Read More
The information contained in this Website is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter.
Read More
chevron-down linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram