Call Now For a Free Consultation:
(614) 502-6165

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Upholds $120 Million Judgment Against Oil Fraudster for Selling Unregistered Securities in the Form of Promissory Notes

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced in February that Joseph Zada was ordered to pay $121.6 million by a federal judge in Michigan following accusations that he duped at least 60 investors into buying unregistered securities in the form of promissory notes. In its complaint, the SEC alleged that Zada raised $27.5 million from 60 investors between 2006 and 2009 through the fraudulent sale of unregistered securities in the form of promissory notes. Zada allegedly told investors that they would earn as much as 48 percent return and that he would invest their funds in oil-related investments through business contacts in oil-producing countries in the Middle East.

Instead, the SEC alleged that Zada conducted a Ponzi scheme, utilizing funds from new investors to pay earlier investors. Approximately $12.4 million was returned to investors as monthly “interest” payments and the rest of the fund went to pay his personal and other expenses unrelated to any investments. Zada, who once owned two multi-million properties in Wellington, Florida including a 22,000-square-foot home in Palm Beach Polo and Country Club, was known for throwing extravagant parties.

Judge Denise Hood granted the SEC’s motion for summary judgment, ruling that the SEC offered overwhelming evidence in support of its motion and that Zada offered little or no evidence to contradict the SEC’s assertions of fact and conclusions of law. The $121.6 million is a combination of civil penalties, interest, and disgorgement.

Zada’s attorney immediately filed an appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit alleging that there were genuine issues of material facts as to whether the transactions at issue were securities, whether misrepresentations were made, the impact of Zada’s invocation of the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, and whether the monetary penalty was reasonable.

The Sixth Circuit upheld the District Court’s judgment, adding in its opinion that "[l]ittle of what Zada told the investors was true. Zada’s connections with Saudi royalty existed only in his imagination. On one occasion Zada invited investors to a party, where he paid actors to pose as a Saudi prince and princess.” You can read the Sixth Circuit’s entire opinion here.In a parallel criminal action , a grand jury in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida indicted Zada in 2013 for mail fraud, wire fraud, money laundering, and interstate transportation of stolen property. The criminal case is still ongoing, and the jury trial is currently set to begin on July 27, 2015.

The information contained in The Firm’s posts on its blog, fraud alerts, investigations or elsewhere on the site is based upon information obtained from other sources including, but not limited to, news outlets and federal, state, and regulatory agency filings. All suspects and subjects of postings herein are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law or administrative action and any and all crimes are alleged until a court or regulatory agency finds otherwise .

Share This Story
If you found the information provided by this article useful, consider sharing to your social media channels to help others in their search for reliable resources.
Consult with Our Legal Team
There is never a cost associated with a consultation
Columbus Office

614-224-6000
305 W. Nationwide Blvd
Columbus, OH 43215
Meyer Wilson
New Orleans Office

900 Camp Street 
Suite 337
New Orleans, LA 70130
Los Angeles Office

310-905-8688
2029 Century Park East,
Suite 400N
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Cleveland Office

216-600-1355
4781 Richmond Rd.
Suite 400
Warrensville Heights, OH 44128
Bloomfield Hills Office

248-817-8214
41000 Woodward Ave.,
Suite 350
Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304
Quick Links
The information contained in this Website is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter. No recipients of content from this site, clients or otherwise, should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included in the site without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from an attorney licensed in the recipient's state. Read More
The information contained in this Website is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter.
Read More
chevron-down linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram